Supreme court and RBI on making the list of defaulters public
Sharing the names of large bank loan defaulters: Need of the hour.
RBI
argued the case of big defaulters in Supreme Court and put forward two pronged
arguments to prevent making the names of big defaulters’ public:
1 There is more and more decentralization of the
functions of the central bank and therefore it was a "herculean task"
for it to get data from all banks.
This
should not be the reason for preventing the disclosure of names of these big
defaulters, for two reasons:
a.
All this data is regularly available with RBI as
part of various reporting systems from banks
b.
Banks themselves may me made mandatory to publish,
at least their top defaulters names, as part of their financials. This can
include top NPAs / SMAs above a cut off amount.
RBI is claiming confidentiality. If it is some law
coming in the way of disclosure of such vital information needed, the law needs
to be amended in the public interest.
The
NGO society for public interest is really doing a yeomen service to the
society. Publishing defaulter’s data will create awareness among the public
about these companies and aids their investment decision, especially listed
companies.
Corporate
structure of business is basically built on trust and ethical values in the
form of corporate governance. However,Today
these are totally missing. Ushering in transparency and ethics in business is
the need of the hour. Government and Hon Supreme Court are really working in
this direction which is a very welcome move.
Throughout
the history we have seen, the powerful sections of the population making rules
which are for the powerful, by the powerful. Society accepted them as law and
must abide. Then, changes came with changing time. Transparency and good
governance demands such disclosure. This will bring a cultural change in the
society/economy and improves our rating in the ease to do business.
RBI's stand is surprising . Probably RBI is fearing of short term adverse impact it may have on such defaulting companies or banks having such large exposure under threat. Whatever it is there is need to bite the bullet at some point or other. Cancer cannot be cured by cosmetic cover. That needs surgery.
Best Regards.
Comments
Post a Comment