Is Banking Meltdown on Asset quality concerns Justified?
Recent meltdown of bank stocks in
Indian bourses is heavily debated as an opportunity for the long term investors
to enter the segment or worse is still to come.
The one most important negative
is NPA and biggest positive is large Bond portfolio of banks having potential
to earn huge profit for banks when interest rates start falling in line with
rates in advanced countries.
NPAs beyond a certain level are a
cause of serious concern. High NPAs disturb recycling of lent funds affecting
credit growth. NPAs also affect profitability by requiring provisioning, which
means a large part of the profits needs to be kept aside as provision against
bad loans. Therefore, the problem of NPAs is the concern of the lenders, borrowers,
investors and the policy makers.
The level of stressed asset in
the banking system has crossed 13% of loan portfolio. As on 31-03-2015 , stressed
assets of public sector banks alone was 7.12 Lac crores. Further, another 3-4 %
is hidden in the books by way of mainly working capital limits and loans put on
innovative ever greening exercises.
Today’s level
of stress in the loan books of banks is partly the making of the banks and the regulator
and the government and partly the effect of economic slowdown and global
factors. Regulator forbearance in various forms as short term and short sighted
solution is the major factor for today’s bad shape of Banks added to political
and corporate part of the game.
Of course the
intent of the government and regulator was good. It was with the intension to
provide some time for the banks to manage the raising NPAs on account of global
factors and economic slowdown. But then, the human instinct is to use (misuse?) every opportunity for the perceived personal
gain. Corporates and banks joined in exploiting the schemes like CDR, ARC, OTS
etc.,
1. The
stigma of NPA and resultant provisioning is driving away banks from classifying
the account as NPA and as a result banks are resorting to ever greening and do
not initiate recovery measures.
2. The
top most contributors to the mess is restructuring including CDR. Business entities
and Banks join hands to misuse this route to restructure /reschedule the
repayment without carrying out a proper viability study and borrowers use this
to extract all benefits from Banks. The sacrifice is only by banks. The
corporate structure of these banks is a contributing factor as no one has
personal interest /commitment to ensure safety of Bank funds. CDR is a major
curse for banks, banks have taken shelter under this and regulator facilitated
this.
3. Nexus
between Unscrupulous borrowers and corrupt/self-serving bank officials is
another major contributor to NPA.
4. Asset
sale to asset reconstruction companies (ARC)
is another major weapon in the
armor of banks to hide NPA and reduce provisioning requirement to manage
P&L and B/S of the bank. In asset sale the purchaser pays just 5% cash and
balance 95 % in the form of security Receipt (SR). This 5% down payment more than gets compensated by 1.5% to 2.5% fee
they get paid per year for next 6-8 years.
SRs are valued at underlying collateral value ( which is highly inflated
or non existing) and not on the record of recovery, thus are shown as standard
asset of very high value in the books of banks where as these are junk bonds.
The ARC has no incentive to recover as stake is very small and ARC hardly has
knowledge about the assets/borrower to ensure better recovery. Banks avoid
provisioning, show NPA as standard asset. Thus, almost entire ARC sale amount
must be treated as NPA or should be valued based on record of recovery. By not
mandating this RBI has facilitated this kind of accounting jugglery.
5. OTS
is another highly misused weapon in the banks and has brought in lot of
corruption.
6. Compensation
structure of bank officials /executives at some banks and promotion and other
perks based on short term (quarter on quarter) performance, is another cause of
this misery. Sanctions /restructuring made with holidays commensurate with
remaining service of the concerned executive/CEO so that account cannot become
NPA during his tenure.
7. There
is serious lacunae in appraisal, post sanction follow up and identifying the
stress at early level and working closely with the borrower. Banks have not
trained their officials and executives on these lines. We manage NPAs and
stress on quarter-to –quarter basis. Main focus is how to avoid NPA this
quarter. This attitude is the main reason behind todays mess.
Rating agency, another
player in this game has further contributed to the mess. Ratings are purchased
by the companies. Only past performance is looked into. Additionally, Same
companies assign research /consulting activity to rating agency to get favorable rating, affecting
the independence of such agencies. Why government/regulator is not prohibiting
any other assignment by these or their sister/related concerns to rating
agency. Highly rated companies have gone bad within months of rating
confirmation. Basel supports rating by fixing lesser capital requirement, but
no guidelines to make them accountable.
Auditors are let scot free when such magnitude
of frauds are happening in the books of corporates.
RBI is very
strict when it comes to small issues at smaller banks and to safeguard it’s
interest or to hide it’s inefficiencies, good at imposing fines on the banks.
Why RBI is not accountable for these kinds of policies which have led to this
pathetic condition of banks, especially PSUs. Where is the accountability for
regulator?
High value
frauds are happening right under the nose of RBI. Each large fraud amounting to
few thousands of crores and PSU banks are the consortium leaders with 10-15
leading banks part of this. How that none of these banks nor RBI is able
identify the fraud till reaching such huge proportion? RBI gets all the info of
large borrowers from each of these banks. In depth study during annual
financial inspection (AFI) of Banks. Are
they not accountable for not putting in place a suitable mechanism to detect
these frauds? Or has their mechanism
failed? Why Government has no will to have severe action against such
fraudsters and they are merrily enjoying spending a small portion of this loot
to finance their lawyers bills and banks
neither have the will nor the ability to book the culprits.
Policy making
and monitoring functions of RBI must be separated. Independent review of the
functioning of the regulator is required, may be by CAG. There should be an
appellate authority in the system that can be approached by aggrieved party for
support. RBI officers must be brought from banks through lateral recruitment to
ensure they understand practical banking, especially for inspection of Banks.
Under the
leadership of Mr. Raghuram Rajan and
also actions from finance ministry under BJP are in the process of bringing in some
improvement in this direction. However, How far these actions will go, one has to watch and see,given the level of
influence this business and industry lobby has on government. Banks must be made healthy and their
exploitation by corporate/business class must be stopped. Who will bell the
cat?
One possible
solution being discussed was, Creating a NPA Bank ( Bad Bank) to transfer all high value fraud/ NPA
accounts. Such bank should have sweeping powers to take action and overtake
management and sell the company and stringent laws to book the defaulters and
fraudsters. Must be headed by a strong banker with impeccable integrity and
high stature. They may be allowed to issue bonds on the basis of such
underlying assets to banks and valuation of such asset can be on the basis of
recovery performance or market driven.
Further, First
year after SR based ARC sale, the SRs are to be treated as NPA and to be
upgraded based on recovery performance as if this is fresh loan. This will
reduce faulty asset sales and lead to better recovery for banks.
Ever greening
should be viewed seriously by regulator. Forensic audit of all high value NPA
accounts under the supervision of RBI and prohibiting such promoters from
accessing the public finance. High value frauds in private banks also should be
brought under CBI.
5:25 scheme is
also a breather, but then we must watch and see how much it will be used and
misused. 15% down payment for ARC sale is a very welcome move from RBI . All
kind of dispensations from RBI must stop.
PSU banks share
prices will be a serious concern for them in raising fresh capital from market.
Shares of major PSUs are below Book value , clear indication of market concern
about quality of asset and disclosure level/transparency of the financials. How will the public confidence be restored? As
of now only hope is possible south ward journey of interest rates bringing them
windfall treasury gains.
Hope, the
Government and RBI together address the vows of banks and bring them back on
track. History repeats. Banks will bounce back again and patient investors will
be rewarded by banking sector in the long run as finance is the life blood of
any economy and banks are the arteries for flow.
It is time to
start creeping investment into stocks of
reasonably well managed PSU banking stocks.
Regards,
Sathya
Comments
Post a Comment